Levika Egita Sulistiyana

	3	2	1	0	Score
A.       Introduction Background/histo-ry Define the problem Thesis Satement	Well developed introductory paragraph contains detailed background, a clear explanation definition of the problem, and a thesis statement	Introductory paragraph contains some background information and states the problem, but does not explain using details. States the thesis of the paper	Introduction states the thesis but does not adequately explain the background of the problem. The problem is stated, but lacks detail.	Thesis and/ or problem is vague or unclear. Background details are a seemingly random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic.
Conclusion	Conclusion summarizes the main topics without repeating previous sentences, writer’s opinions and suggestions for change are logical  and well thought one.	Conclusion summarizes main topics. Some suggestions for change are evident.	Conclusion summarizes main topics but is repetitive. No suggestions for change and/ or opinions are included.	Conclusion does not adequately summarize the main points. No suggestions for change or opinions are included.
B.     Main Points Body paragraphs refutation	Three or more main points are well developed with supporting details. Refutation paragraph(s) acknowledges the opposing view and summarizes their main points	Theree or more main points are present but may lack detail aand development in one or two. Refutatio paragraph(s) acknowledges the opposing view but doesn’t summarize points	Three or more main points, but all lack development. Refutation paragraph (s) missing and/ or vague.	Less then three main points, with poordevelopment of ideas. Refutation missing or vague.
C.     Organization	Logical, compelling progression of ideas in essay; clear structure which enhances and shoocases the central idea or theme and moves thr reader through the text. Organization flow so smoothly the reader hardly thinks about it. Effective, mature, graceful transitions exist throughout thr essay.	Overall, the papers is logically developed. Progession of ideas in essay makes sense and moves the reader easily through the text. Strong transitions exixts throughout and add to the essay’s coherence	Progression of ideas in essay ias awkward, yet moves te reader through the text without too much confusion. The writer sometimes lunges ahead too quickly or spends too much time on detailes that do not matter. Transitions appear sporadically, but not equally throughout the essay.	Arrangement of essay is unclear and illogical. The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas, details orevents seem strung together in a loose or random fashion; there is no identifiable internal stucture and readers have trouble following the writer’s line of thought. Few, forced transitions in the essay or no transitions are present.
D.     Works Cited	Source material is smoothly integrated into the text. All sources are acurately documented in the desired format both in the text and on the Works Cited page	Source material is used. All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in the dered format. Some sources lack credibility.	Source material is used, but integration may be awkward. All sources are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format or lack credibility.	Lack sources and/ or sources are not accurately documented. Format is incorrect for all sources.
E.      Mechanics Senence Structure, Punctuation, and Capitalization	Sentences structure is correct. Punctuation and capitalization are correct.	Sentences structure is generally correct. Some awkward sentences do appear. There are one or two errors in punctuation and/ or capitalization	Work contains structural weaknesses and grammatical errors. There are three or four errors in punctuation and/ or capitalization.	Work contains multiple incorrect sentence structures. There are four more errors in punctuation and/ or capitalization